SEC Charges HD Vest Investment Securities

HD Vest Investment Securities Charged

On March 4, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it had charged HD Vest Investment Securities with violating key customer protection rules after failing to adequately supervise registered representatives who misappropriated customer funds.

HD Vest Investment Securities agreed to settle the charges by paying a financial penalty and retaining an independent compliance consultant to improve its supervisory controls.

According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, HD Vest has more than 4,500 registered representatives typically working as independent contractors who also operate tax businesses outside of their securities businesses.  HD Vest failed to have proper policies and procedures in place to monitor its representatives’ outside business activities, and as a result some representatives used their outside businesses to defraud brokerage customers in such ways as transferring or depositing customer brokerage funds into their outside business accounts.

The SEC’s order further finds that HD Vest did not follow customer protection rules in the wake of the wrongdoing by its representatives.  Under these rules to protect customer funds and securities in the possession of broker-dealers, H.D. Vest was required to make certain calculations and, if necessary, deposit funds into a reserve account for the benefit of customers who were harmed by the representatives’ misconduct.  HD Vest neither made the calculations nor maintained a reserve account. 

“HD Vest lacked sufficient supervisory controls to track the transfer of customer funds to outside entities controlled by its registered representatives,” said David R. Woodcock, Director of the SEC Enforcement of the Fort Worth Regional Office.  “Firms like HD Vest do face greater challenges in supervising their representatives in numerous small branch offices spread across the country, but that doesn’t excuse the firm from establishing adequate policies and procedures to address those challenges.”

The SEC’s order finds that HD Vest violated the supervision requirements of Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as the customer protection rules found in Section 15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act and in Rule 15c3-3.  HD Vest also violated the document preservation requirements in Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and in Rule 17a-4(b)(4).  HD Vest consented without admitting or denying the findings in the SEC’s order to cease and desist from committing these violations and pay a $225,000 penalty.  The representatives involved in the misconduct have since been the subject of criminal, civil, or FINRA enforcement actions. 

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at [email protected].   This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855