SEC Charges Robert Crowe for Joining a Pay-to-Play Scheme

Robert Crowe Charged for Involvement in Pay-to-Play SchemeThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a complaint against Robert Crowe, a law firm partner who worked as a fundraiser and lobbyist for State Street Bank and Trust Company. The complaint alleges that Crowe participated in a pay-to-play scheme to win contracts to service Ohio pension funds.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Crowe repeatedly caused concealed campaign contributions to be made on behalf of State Street to the Ohio State Treasurer to influence the Treasurer to select and retain State Street to provide securities custody work. Read More

SEC Wins Insider Trading Case Against Capital One Employee

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a jury verdict in its favor in a federal district court trial in Philadelphia against Nan Huang, who the agency charged with insider trading on information he illegally obtained from his employer Capital One Financial Corporation.

In its complaint filed in Pennsylvania on January 21, 2015, the SEC alleged that Huang worked for Capital One, a large credit card issuer, as a data analyst in the fraud department. While employed there, Huang and another individual searched their employer’s nonpublic database that recorded the credit card activity for millions of customers at numerous, predominantly consumer retail corporations. Huang conducted hundreds, if not thousands, of keyword searches of this database. Read More

SEC Obtains Judgment Against Steven Davis

SEC Judgment Steven Davis

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on January 8, 2016, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a judgment against defendant Steven Davis. The judgment resolves all issues of liability against Davis arising from the SEC’s filing of a civil complaint against him on March 6, 2014. A permanent injunction against Davis was entered prohibiting him from future violations of certain SEC antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and bars Davis from serving as an officer or director of a publicly traded company. Read More

DTC Imposes Corporate Action DTC Eligibility Fee

DTC Eligibility

On December 30, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published a notice that it was soliciting comments for a proposed rule change submitted by The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) filed a pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder. DTC’s proposed rule was effective upon submission to the SEC.

DTC’s proposed rule change consists of a change to DTC’s Fee Schedule (“Fee Schedule”) to add a new DTC eligibility fee that would be charged to the transfer agent of any DTC-eligible issue when the transfer agent notifies DTC of a corporate action event (“Corporate Action”) that requires a new CUSIP to be made DTC-eligible. The types of actions that require a new CUSIP must be submitted to The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) pursuant to Rule 6490. Under these circumstances, DTC conducts a review of the issuer’s shares in street name. Issuers must demonstrate the “free trading” nature of their shares in street name by providing DTC with a legal opinion. Corporate Actions requiring a new CUSIP include forward and reverse stock splits, name changes, and certain recapitalizations. These types of transactions require FINRA and DTC to spend significant time and effort in their review.

Read More

Martin Shkreli Charged with Securities Fraud

Martin Shkreli Charged with FraudOn December 17, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Martin Shkreli, former CEO of pharmaceutical company Retrophin, with committing fraud during a 5-year period when he also was working as a hedge fund manager. He is notoriously known for raising the cost of the antiparasitic drug Daraprim and raising its price by 5,556 percent.

The SEC alleges that Martin Shkreli misappropriated money from two hedge funds he founded and made material misrepresentations to investors among other widespread misconduct. The SEC also charged Retrophin’s former outside counsel and corporate secretary Evan Greebel with aiding and abetting certain aspects of Shkreli’s alleged fraud. Read More

SEC Obtains Asset Freeze of Oxford City Football Club

 

The SEC filed a complaint that charged Oxford City Football Club and its CEO, Thomas Anthony Guerriero, with securities fraud.On December 10, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a complaint that charged Oxford City Football Club, Inc. and its CEO, Thomas Anthony Guerriero, with securities fraud and other violations of the federal securities laws. The Court issued a temporary restraining order, asset freeze, and other emergency relief against Oxford City, Guerriero, and relief defendant GCE Wealth, Inc., an entity that Guerriero owned and controlled.

In the fraud complaint, the SEC claims that Guerriero used deceptive tactics and a boiler room of salespeople to raise over $6.5 million primarily obtained from inexperienced investors who were misled to believe that the company was a thriving conglomerate of sports teams, academic institutions, and real estate holdings. However, the company was actually losing millions of dollars each year and turning zero profit from its two lower-division soccer teams in the U.K. Read More

Court Issues Final Judgment Against Auditor Timothy Quintanilla

Securities Fraud
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that, on December 4, 2015, the Court for the Southern District of New York issued a final judgment, on consent of defendant Timothy Quintanilla, which permanently enjoined him from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and ordered him to pay a $100,000 civil penalty. Quintanilla was the former outside auditor of Electronic Game Card Inc. (EGMI). This final judgment fully resolves the enforcement action before Judge Sullivan, in which final judgments were previously entered against three other defendants, former CEO Kevin Donovan, Lee Cole (Donovan’s predecessor as CEO), and Linden Boyne (EGMI’s former CFO), who the SEC charged with violations of the securities laws’ antifraud provisions and other violations. Read More

SEC Charges Vinh Le and His Company with Fraud

SEC Charges


The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on December 15, 2015, it filed charges against Vu Le a/k/a Vinh Le and his company, TeamVinh.com LLC (“TeamVinh”), in connection with their fraudulent raising of more than $3 million from over 5,600 investors throughout the United States and in various foreign countries.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Minnesota:

  • Vinh Le, who previously had been convicted of forgery and barred from offering or selling securities by state authorities in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and TeamVinh lured people into buying memberships in a program that Le and TeamVinh claimed to be a referral network that investors could use to earn an income from multi-level marketing companies without the investors having to do any work.
  • Vinh Le and TeamVinh sold investment contracts in TeamVinh itself, promising investors a percentage of TeamVinh’s profits.
  • Vinh Le and TeamVinh sought investments in a purported commodities trading platform run by Le, with Le guaranteeing investors 5% weekly returns.

Read More

SEC Charges Edward Durante with Securities Fraud

 

The SEC charged Edward Durante with operating an offering fraud that targeted investors in New England, Ohio and California.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Edward Durante, a recidivist securities law violator with operating a multi-year offering fraud that targeted investors in New England, Ohio and California. The SEC’s complaint alleges that between 2012 and 2014, Durante defrauded at least 50 relatively unsophisticated investors of at least $11 million through the sale of securities of VGTel, Inc., a shell company he controlled. Read More

Information About Foreign Issuers and Foreign Companies

Regulation A+The U.S. capital markets have long been a desired goal for foreign companies that are interested in raising funds or establishing a trading market for their securities.

Two of the most important laws applicable to companies seeking to go public in the U.S. capital markets are the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The Securities Act requires foreign companies that want to offer and sell securities in the United States to register the transaction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or to follow the requirements of an exemption from the registration requirements. The Exchange Act requires companies to register classes of equity securities in order to list these securities on a US national securities exchange unless certain asset and shareholder thresholds are met. The Exchange Act also requires companies to make periodic filings with the SEC to disclose information about their business operations, financial condition, and management.

In the discussion that follows, this overview outlines several things to be considered by foreign companies that want to raise profits or establish a presence for their securities in the United States, specifically with reference to foreign private issuers. Read More

FAST Reduces Form S-1 Rules & Creates the Section 4(a)(7) Resale Resale Exemption

FAST Act Section 4(a)(7)

Last month, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, or FAST Act became law. The FAST Act is primarily a transportation bill but there are changes to the federal securities laws which should assist in the capital raising process particularly for Emerging Growth Companies.  The JOBS Act defines an Emerging Growth Company as an issuer with annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recent fiscal year.  The FAST Act impacts the securities registration process and the use of Form S-1 registration statements in an issuer’s initial public offering (“IPO”). The new rule should ease some of the burdens for small companies during the going public process.

The FAST Act requires the SEC to scale or eliminate regulatory requirements to reduce regulatory burdens on certain types of filers, including Emerging Growth Companies, and to eliminate regulations that are duplicative, overlapping, outdated or unnecessary. The SEC has 180 days from the enactment of the FAST Act to complete this task.

Road Show Waiting Periods

The FAST Act reduces the waiting period for road shows by Emerging Growth Companies. Under the FAST Act, an Emerging Growth Company cannot commence its road show 15 days after publicly filing its initial public offering (“IPO”) registration statement. The former rule required the issuer wait 21 days before conducting its road show. Read More

How Do I Register A Direct Public Offering?

Registration Statement - Securities Lawyer 101
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Private companies seeking to go public often use a direct public offering (“Direct Public Offering”).  Unlike an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”), a Direct Public Offering allows an issuer to sell its shares directly to investors without the use of an underwriter as  part of its going public transaction.

Registration Statements and Direct Public Offerings

A Direct Public Offering involves registering securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)  on a Form S-1 (”S-1”) Registration Statement, either on its own behalf in a primary offering or on behalf of its selling security holders in a secondary offering.   Direct Public offerings are frequently used to raise capital in connection with going public transactions that involve filing a registration statement on Form S-1.

All issuers qualify to register securities on Form S-1 and it is the most commonly used registration statement in going public transactions. Using Form S-1 eliminates many of risks and costs of reverse mergers and public shell companies including DTC Chills, Global Locks and SEC trading suspensions. Read More

Court Enters Final Judgment Against eAdGear and Its Operators

Court Enters Final Judgment Against eAdGear and Its OperatorsThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on February 1, 2016, the Honorable Richard Seeborg of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered final judgments against defendants eAdGear Holdings Limited, eAdGear, Inc., Charles Wang, Francis Yuen, Qian Cathy Zhang, and relief defendant Laurata Chan. The final judgments order the defendants and relief defendant to pay a total of $26,539,280 in disgorgement, penalties, and prejudgment interest.

The SEC’s complaint, filed on September 24, 2014, together with a request to the court for emergency relief, charged the defendants with operating an international pyramid scheme to fraudulently raise more than $129 million from investors, in violation of the federal securities laws. The complaint alleged that defendants used money from new eAdGear investors to pay earlier investors, as well as to repay a personal loan and purchase million-dollar homes for the individual defendants. Read More

Robert Bray Found Guilty of Insider Trading

 

Robert BrayThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that on January 28, 2016, a jury in the federal court in Boston Massachusetts, returned a guilty verdict against Watertown real-estate developer Robert Bray in a criminal trial prosecuted by the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney. The jury convicted Bray of engaging in insider trading, a type of securities fraud. U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young scheduled sentencing for May 4, 2016.The SEC previously charged Bray and Patrick O’Neill with insider trading in a civil action filed on August 18, 2014.

The criminal case is based on the same conduct underlying the SEC’s action. The SEC’s complaint alleged that O’Neill, a former senior vice president at Eastern Bank Corporation, learned through his job responsibilities that his employer was planning to acquire Wainwright Bank & Trust Company (“Wainwright”) and he then tipped Bray, a friend and fellow golfer with whom he socialized at a local country club. In the criminal trial, the government proved that the tip was passed on a napkin that O’Neill slipped to Bray over drinks at the country club bar two weeks before a public announcement about the planned acquisition. Read More

SEC Seeks Enforcement Action After Reverse Merger

 

 

Business Lawyer - SEC DefenseThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed an action to enforce compliance with document and testimony subpoenas served upon Jessica Gilbertson in an SEC investigation for possible violations of the securities laws captioned In the Matter of Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc. The case reflects a string of recent enforcement cases involving reverse merger issuers. According to the SEC and FBI, reverse mergers are often instruments of fraud and illegal activity by fraudsters.

According to the SEC’s application that was filed on December 10, 2015: Read More

SEC Charges CAUSwave and Its Principals with Fraud

CAUSwave - FraudOn December 14, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged a Pittsboro, North Carolina-based startup energy company and two executives with defrauding investors in an unregistered stock offering as they purported that a big influx of capital was on the way from a major investor.

According to the SEC’s complaint against CAUSwave Inc. and its principals Jeffrey Riggs and Diane Baldwin:

Read More

SEC Files Subpoena Against President of FX & Beyond Corporation

 

SEC Subpoena Filed Against Karroum On December 9, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a court order in its subpoena enforcement action against respondent Steve Karroum that requires Mr. Karroum to sign a written consent for the release of his e-mails from his internet service provider. On May 11, 2015 the SEC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Virginia-based FX & Beyond Corporation and its president, Mr. Karroum. After a hearing on the matter, on August 5, 2015 the Hon. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson issued an order requiring Mr. Karroum to, among other things, sign a consent for the release of his e-mails from his internet service provider to the SEC. On August 10, 2015 Karroum filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s order. Read More

Robert Seibert Charged In Scheme Targeting Seniors

Senior InvestorsOn December 2, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Robert Seibert with operating a multi-year offering fraud that targeted elderly investors.

According to the SEC’s complaint:

  • Seibert, who was previously charged by the SEC in 1993 with securities fraud and who has been convicted multiple times for securities-related offenses, owned and operated a Nevada limited liability company called Universal Stock Transfer (“UST”) out of Palm Desert, CA.
  • Using the alias “John Grey,” Seibert, who has never been registered with the SEC, together with sales agents who identified themselves as “Ron Woods” and “Sebastian Wilson,” cold-called investors who ranged in age from 56 to 95 and encouraged them to buy from them a variety of stocks quoted on OTC Link, an inter-dealer quotation system for over-the-counter securities.
  • Seibert and the UST agents told the elderly investors that the stocks they were selling would significantly increase in value shortly after purchase. Read More

Jehu Hand Charged with Market Manipulation Scheme

Securities FraudThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged a California-licensed attorney and a stock promoter behind a pump-and-dump scheme that defrauded investors in Greenway Technology, a Las Vegas-based company purporting to operate resorts for gay and lesbian travelers.

The SEC alleges that Jehu Hand and Antonio Katz and three additional participants carried out the scheme by, among other things, using one or more backdated debt assignments, or convertible promissory notes, to cause the issuance of millions of unrestricted shares of Greenway stock to entities and individuals under their control. Hand (or an attorney associated with him) then wrote and sent false legal opinion letters to brokerage and other firms transacting in Greenway stock to facilitate the issuance, depositing, and, ultimately, sale of the stock. These opinions represented, among other things, that Greenway was not a shell company. According to the complaint, all of the false opinion letters that Hand authored were designed to clear the way for Greenway stock held by the scheme participants to be sold, without restriction, to unsuspecting investors in the market. Read More

Court Approves Settlement Between SEC and Covenant Partners

Settlement Approved Between SEC and Covenant PartnersThe United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued an order approving of the terms of a proposed settlement between the SEC and Covenant Partners, L.P., a Philadelphia-area private equity fund. Read More

Court Enters Summary Judgment Against Enron’s Former CEO

Summary Judgment-Enron CEOThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a summary judgment against former Enron president, COO, and CEO Jeffrey Skilling to conclude its civil case that was stayed by the court starting in 2004 until the outcome of criminal proceedings and appeals.

The Honorable Judge Melinda Harmon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an order finding that as a result of the collateral estoppel effect of Skilling’s criminal convictions and statement of non-opposition to the SEC’s motion for summary judgment, Skilling committed and was liable for each claim alleged against him in the SEC’s complaint filed in July 2004. Read More

SEC Files Suit Against Promoter of ZeekRewards

 

Trudy Gilmond Charged - Unregistered offer and Sale of SecuritiesOn December 4, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed suit against Trudy Gilmond for her participation in the unregistered offer and sale of securities through Rex Venture Group LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com, an internet-based combined Ponzi and pyramid scheme. According to the Complaint, from approximately January 2011 until August 2012, when the ZeekRewards website was shut down, Rex Venture Group raised more than $850 million from approximately one million internet customers nationwide and overseas through the website.

The Complaint alleges that Gilmond solicited investors through the Internet and other means to participate in the ZeekRewards program, a self-described “affiliate advertising division” for the companion website, Zeekler.com, through which the company operated penny auctions. The ZeekRewards program offered customers several ways to earn money, two of which – the “Retail Profit Pool” and the “Matrix” – involved purchasing securities in the form of investment contracts. These securities offerings were not registered with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws. Read More

SEC Late Filers 101 – Going Public Attorneys

Late SEC Filers

It’s that time of year again when companies filing reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that have a December 31st year end, must file their annual report on Form 10-K. Recent enforcement actions against SEC filers and insiders for failure to comply with their SEC reporting obligations. It has become routine for the SEC to suspend issuers who become inactive and miss their annual 10-K or quarterly 10-Q filing deadlines. This is especially true for new SEC late filers who are unfamiliar with SEC reporting after their going public transactions.

The obligation to file Form 10-K annually and Form 10-Q quarterly reports originates from Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and Rule 13a-1 and Rule 13a-13 promulgated there under. Late SEC filers receive only one automatic extension per filing so it is important that the late reports be filed within the required extension period. In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, as determined in the SEC’s sole discretion, no additional extensions are available to issuers.  The SEC has the ability to enforce periodic filing requirements by instituting enforcement actions against a delinquent SEC filer and/or its officers and directors seeking monetary or other penalties, including revoking the filer’s registration pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act.  In the absence of egregious and/or repeated violations, or inferences of fraud, however, the SEC will not likely take action.

If you are a SEC reporting issuer missing a SEC filing deadline for a periodic report, these are some of the important issues that you should consider: Read More

SEC Charges Hui Feng With EB-5 Offering Fraud

EB-5 Offering Attorneys
The SEC filed a complaint alleging that Hui Feng and his firm, Law Offices of Feng & Associates P.C., acted as unregistered brokers by selling EB-5 investments to over 100 foreign investors, who were also their legal clients, and that they, directly or indirectly, received over $1.1 million in commissions in connection with these sales and are contractually entitled to at least an additional $3.1 million in commissions. The complaint also claims that Feng and his firm defrauded their investor clients by failing to disclose their receipt of commissions on the investments in breach of their fiduciary and legal duties to their clients, and that they also defrauded some of the entities offering the EB-5 investments. Read More

Court Finds Wayne Palmer Guilty in Ponzi Scheme

Ponzi SchemeThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) won a case involving a Ponzi scheme. According to the SEC Wayne Palmer and his company National Note of Utah. The SEC filed fraud charges against them in June 2012 in connection with the Ponzi Scheme. The Court found that Palmer promised more than 600 investors a guaranteed 12% annual return and assured them their money was completely secured and being used to make hard money loans, purchase notes, and acquire real estate. In reality, Palmer deposited investor funds in one bank account titled “investor trust account,” wired the funds to a second bank account titled “investor interest account,” and then used the funds to pay returns to other investors. Read More

SEC Files Subpoena Against NetCirq LLC

Regulation A+ Disclosure AttorneysOn November 25, 2015, the SEC filed a subpoena enforcement action against NetCirq, LLC (“NetCirq”). According to the SEC’s application and supporting papers, the SEC is investigating whether NetCirq and others have violated or are violating provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with transactions involving pre-IPO companies, including transactions that may constitute security-based swaps or secondary market trading in possible violation of certain registration requirements. Pursuant to the SEC’s subpoena dating back to May 2015, NetCirq was obliged to produce documents to the SEC, but failed to do so. Read More

Cry Me a Sater…Felix Sater & Donald Trump

 

Felix Sater - Securities Fraud

In February 2015, Felix Sater proudly announced the debut of a new website.  As he puts it, it “showcases [his] accomplishments, contributions, musings, and availability.”  Though Sater describes himself as a veteran of the commercial real estate industry, there’s more to his story, much of it unsavory.  While the site is promoted as a “hub for all things relating to Felix Sater,” it says nothing at all about his two criminal convictions, mob ties or the sealed docket that prevents the public from learning the details of his prior criminal conduct.

According to the website, one of Sater’s passions is politics.  It seems only fitting that in recent days a number of articles have appeared in the mainstream press examining his business association with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Sater was born in the Soviet Union in 1966, but his family moved to Brighton Beach in New York City when he was a child.  At 20, he became a stock broker.  His career came to an abrupt end in 1991, when he viciously attacked a colleague in a barroom brawl, breaking the man’s jaw and slashing his face with a broken margarita glass.  Sater was sent to prison for first degree assault.  Oddly, the National Association of Securities Dealers, as FINRA was then called, did not ban him from the industry until February 2000, though Broker Check indicates that its report on Sater contains “very limited information.” Read More

Court Enters Final Judgment In Penny Stock Case

 

Penny Stock ManipulationThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that the Court entered a final judgment against Defendant Chad Smanjak on November 23, 2015 in SEC v. Ruettiger, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-02011, a penny stock manipulation case the SEC filed on December 16, 2011. The SEC’s complaint alleged that Smanjak engaged in a market manipulation scheme involving the stock of Rudy Nutrition, which generated more than $11 million in illicit profits.

The court entered a consent final judgment against Smanjak that permanently enjoins him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; bars him from participating in any offering of a penny stock; and orders disgorgement of $2,010,286 and prejudgment interest of $454,963, which was satisfied by Smanjak’s consent to forfeiture in related criminal proceedings. In those proceedings, Smanjak has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and is awaiting sentencing. See U.S. v. Smanjak, SA CR No. 10-215 (C.D. Cal.). Read More

SEC Acquires Court Order for an Asset Freeze for Lin Zhong

 

Asset FreezeThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on November 19, 2015 that it has obtained a court order freezing the assets of a South Florida woman and her company accused of purchasing a boat and luxury cars with money she raised from investors seeking U.S. residency through the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Pilot Program.

Under the EB-5 program, foreign citizens may qualify for U.S. residency if they make a qualified investment of at least $500,000 in a specified project that creates or preserves at least 10 jobs for U.S. workers. The SEC claims that Lin Zhong and her company EB5 Asset Manager LLC raised at least $8.5 million for use by U.S. EB-5 Investments LLC in job-creating real estate development projects, but they diverted nearly $1 million to purchase a boat, a BMW, and a Mercedes among other improper personal uses of investor funds. Read More

SEC Announces Emergency Halt on Fraudster’s Operations

 Credit Nation Capital, LLC (formerly known as Credit Nation Lending, LLC) ("CN Capital"), a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock Georgia; (ii) Credit Nation Acceptance, LLC ("CN Acceptance"), a Texas limited liability company in Midland, Texas; (iii) Credit Nation Auto Sales, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock, Georgia; (iv) American Motor Credit, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock, Georgia; and (v) Spaghetti Junction, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company.On December 1, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the entry of a Consent Order (“Order”) halting an alleged ongoing investment fraud by James Torchia and various related entities involving the sale of promissory notes and life settlement contracts.

On November 10, 2015 the SEC filed an emergency halt against Torchia and the following entities that he operates and controls: (i) Credit Nation Capital, LLC (formerly known as Credit Nation Lending, LLC) (“CN Capital”), a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock Georgia; (ii) Credit Nation Acceptance, LLC (“CN Acceptance”), a Texas limited liability company in Midland, Texas; (iii) Credit Nation Auto Sales, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock, Georgia; (iv) American Motor Credit, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company in Woodstock, Georgia; and (v) Spaghetti Junction, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. Read More